«BULLETIN OF THE IRKUTSK STATE UNIVERSITY. GEOARCHAEOLOGY, ETHNOLOGY, AND ANTHROPOLOGY SERIES»
ISSN 2227-2380 (Print)

List of issues > «Geoarchaeology, Ethnology, and Anthropology Series». 2018. Vol. 24

Lithic Technology of the Middle Upper Paleolithic in Northern Mongolia (cultural horizon 2 of Tolbor 21 site): Problem Statement

Author(s)
E. P. Rybin, G. D. Pavlenok, A. M. Khatsenovich, D. V. Marchenko, B. Gunchinsuren
Abstract

Upper Paleolithic complexes of Northern Mongolia are chronologically determined, and represent the cultural sequence with changes, which could be stemmed from gradual evolution as well as migrations of population. The Late Upper Paleolithic was preceded by chronostratigraphic lacuna in 26–16 ka BP, when no one unequivocal evidence of human presence in Northern Mongolia was found. Following this, it is important to define the common features of the Late Upper Paleolithic and antecedent local complexes, as well as synchronous assemblages of neighboring Russian Transbaikalia for understanding of character of the cultural continuity/discontinuity in Mongolian Upper Paleolithic. The cultural shifts observed in archeological sequences document some of these events. Here we consider the complex from cultural layer 2 of Tolbor 21 site, situated in Northern Mongolia. Based on stratigraphic situation of this complex and its correlation to culturally similar objects we relate it to the middle stage of Upper Paleolithic, finding out first time for the territory of Northern Mongolia. Its industry can be dated to the final Karginian interstadial – early Sartan stadial. This complex is characterized by dominance of unidirectional parallel reduction of flat and subprismatic cores for flake and blade production. Tool assemblage contains scrapers, end-scrapers and perforators. Also there is a small blade component, presented by bladelets and microblades, flaked by percussion, and used as the tool blank for such types like borers, backed bladelets and geometric tool – bi-truncated bladelet-trapeze. Complex of horizon 2 is more likely reflecting the early stage of this tradition and has a range of distinctive features. First of all, the small subprismatic cores are absent, but that can be explained by functional factor, when cores were taken away from the settlement to be used somewhere else, or it can be the consequence of the specific reduction technology, aimed to knapping of large cores, transported from the closest raw material outcrops. This variant of cultural complex did not developed in a further time. Final Upper Paleolithic complexes presents pressure microblade technology.

About the Authors

Rybin Evgenii Pavladievich, Candidate of Sciences (History), Senior Researcher, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS; 17, Akad. Lavrentiev av., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation, e-mail: rybep@yandex.ru 

Khatsenovich Arina Mikhailovna, Junior Researcher, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS; 17, Akad. Lavrentiev av., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation, e-mail: archeomongolia@gmail.com 

Pavlenok Galina Dmitrievna, Candidate of Sciences (History), Researcher, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS; 17, Acad. Lavrentiev av., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation, e-mail: lukianovagalina@yandex.ru 

Marchenko Daria Valerievna, Postgraduate, Novosibirsk State University; 1, Pirogov st., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation, e-mail: dasha-smychagina@yandex.ru

Gunchinsuren Byambaa, Candidate of Sciences (History), Senior Researcher, Institute of History and Archaeology of Academy of Science of Mongolia; 77, Zhukov st., Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, 125, 13343, e-mail: bgunchinsuren@yahoo.com

For citation

Rybin E. P., Pavlenok G. D., Khatsenovich A. M., Marchenko D. V., Gunchinsuren B. Lithic Technology of the Middle Upper Paleolithic in Northern Mongolia (cultural horizon 2 of Tolbor 21 site): Problem Statement. Bulletin of the Irkutsk State University. Geoarchaeology, Ethnology, and Anthropology Series. 2018, Vol. 24, pp. 39–60. https://doi.org/10.26516/2227-2380.2018.24.39 (in Russ.)

Keywords
Central Asia, Mongolia, Middle Upper Paleolithic, lithic technology
UDC
903.01(517.3)"6325"
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26516/2227-2380.2018.24.39
References

Astashkin A. V., Derevianko A. P., Milov A. D., Nikolaev S. V., Petrin V. T. , Tzvetkov Y. D. The EPR-dating: Comparison of EPR and 14C methods in bone dating at the archaeological site Orkhon-7 (Mongolia). Altaica. 1993,No 3, pp. 9–13. (In Russ.; In English)

Barton L. Brantingham P. J., Ji D. X. Late Pleistocene climate change and Paleolithic cultural evolution in northern China: implications from the Last Glacial Maximum. Late Quaternary climate change and human adaptation in arid China (Developments in Quaternary Science 9). Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2007, pp. 105–128.

Bazargur D. Clarification on the stone tools technological methods and chronological issue of Rashaan Khad site. Acta Historica Mongolici. 2014, Vol. 15 (1), pp. 5–20.

Bertran P., Fontugne M., Jaubert J. Permafrost aggradation followed by brutal degradation during the upper Pleniglacial in Mongolia: the probable response to the H2 Heinrich event at 21 kyr BP. Permafrost Periglac. Process. 2003, No 14, pp. 1–9.

Bertran P. Jaubert J., Olive M., Sitlivy V., Tsogtbaatar B. The Palaeolithic Site of Mojl'tyn-Am (Harhorin, Mongolie): Thirty Years after A. P. Okladnikov. Paleoekologiya pleistotsena i kultury kamennogo veka Severnoi Azii i sopredelnykh territorii [Pleistocene paleoecology and cultures of Stone Age of Northern Asia and neighboring territories]. Novosibirsk, 1998, Vol. 1, pp. 210–226. (In Russ.)

Bronk Ramsey C. OxCal 4.3.2. 2017. Available at: http://c14.arch.ox.ac.uk. (date of access: 10.03.2018)

Clark P. U., Dyke A. S., Shakun J. D., Carlson A. E., Clark J., Wohfarth B., Mitrovica J. X., Hostetler S. W., McCabe A. M. The Last Glacial Maximum. Science. 2009, No 325, pp. 710–714.

Derevianko A. P. Perekhod ot srednego k verkhnemu paleolitu i problema formirovaniya Homo Sapiens sapiens v Vostochnoi, Tsentralnoi i Severnoi Azii [Middle–Upper Paleolithic transition and problem of Homo Sapiens sapiens formation in Eastern, Central and Northern Asia]. Novosibirsk, IAET SB RAS Publ., 2009, 328 p. (In Russ.)

Derevyanko A. P., Kandyba A. V. K voprosu o perekhode ot srednego paleolita k verkhnemu na territorii Mongolii: rezultaty poslednikh issledovanii [The problem of Middle–Upper transition at the territory of Mongolia: results of recent research]. Problemy arkheologii, etnografii, antropologii Sibiri i sopredelnykh territorii [Problems of Archaeology, Ethnography, Anthropology of Siberia and Neighboring Territories]. Novosibirsk, 2009, Vol. 15, Part 1, pp. 118–122. (In Russ.)

Derevianko A. P., Kandyba A. V., Petrin V. T. Paleolit Orkhona [Paleolithic of Orkhon]. Novosibirsk, 2010, 384 p. (In Russ.)

Derevianko A. P. Brantingham P. J., Olsen J. W., Tseveendorj D. Initial Upper Paleolithic Blade Industries from the North-Central Gobi Desert, Mongolia. The Early Upper Paleolithic beyond Western Europe. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, Univ. of California Press, 2004, pp. 207–222.

Derevianko A.P., Gladyshev S.A., Olsen J.W., Petrin V.T., Tserendagva Y. Characteristic features of the Chickhen Agui Lithic assemblage (Gobi Altai). Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia. 2001, Is. 5, pp. 25–39.

Derevyanko A. P., Markin S. V., Olsen Dzh., Tserendagva Ya., Petrin V. T. Mestonakhozhdenie kamennogo veka Chikhen 2 v Yuzhnoi Mongolii [Chikhen 2 site of the Stone Age in Southern Mongolia]. Problemy arkheologii, etnografii, antropologii Sibiri i sopredelnykh territorii [Problems of Archaeology, Ethnography, Anthropology of Siberia and Neighboring Territories]. Novosibirsk, 2000, Vol. 6, pp. 50–54. (In Russ.)

Derevianko A. P., Olsen J. W., Tseveendorj D., Krivoshapkin A. I., Petrin V. T., Brantingham P. J. The Stratified Cave site of Tsagaan Agui in the Gobi Atai (Mongolia). Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia. 2000, Is. 1, pp. 23–36.

Derevyanko A. P., Olsen D., Tsevendorzh D., Petrin V. T., Gladyshev S. A., Zenin A. N., Krivoshapkin A. I., Mylnikov V. P., Gunchinsuren B., Tserendagva Ya. Arkheologicheskie issledovaniya Rossiisko-Mongolsko-Amerikanskoi ekspeditsii v Mongolii v 1997–1998 godakh [Archaeological studies of Russian-Mongolian-American expedition in Mongolia in 1997–1998]. Novosibirsk, IAET SB RAS Publ., 2000, 384 p. (In Russ.) 

Gladyshev S. A., Gunchinsurjen B., Jull A. D., Dogandzhich T., Zwyns N., Olsen J. W., Richards M., Tabarev A. V., Talamo S. Radiouglerodnoe datirovanie paleoliticheskikh stoyanok v doline reki Ikh-Tulberiin-Gol v Severnoi Mongolii [Radiocarbon dating of the Paleolithic sites in Ikh-Tulberiin-Gol river valley, Northern Mongolia]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i filologiya [Vestnik Novosibirsk State University. Series: History and Philology]. 2013, Vol. 12, Is. 5, pp. 44–49. (In Russ.)

Goebel T. The “Microblade Adaptation” and recolonization of Siberia during the late Upper Pleistocene. Elston R.G., Kuhn S.L. (eds.). Thinking Small: Global Perspectives on Microlithization. Arlington, American Anthropological Association, 2002, pp. 117–131.

Graf K. E. “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly”: evaluating the radiocarbon chronology of the middle and late Upper Paleolithic in the Enisei River valley, south-central Siberia. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2009, Vol. 36, pp. 694–707.

Gunchinsuren B., Gladyshev S. A., Bolorbat Ts., Tabarev A. V., Odsuren D., Tsybankov A. A., Chargynov T. T. Novye dannye po izucheniyu mnogosloinogo paleoliticheskogo pamyatnika Tulber-15 v 2009 godu [New data for the study of multilayered paleolithic site Tulber-15 in 2009]. Arkheologiin sudlal [Archaeological study]. 2010, Vol. (9) 29, pp. 5–31. (In Russ.)

Jaubert J., Bertran P., Fontugne M., Jarry M., Lacombe S., Leroyer C., Marmet E., Taborin Y., Tsogtbaatar B., Brugal J. P., Desclaux F., Poplin F., Rodiere J., Servelle C. Le Paleolithique superieur ancien de Mongolie: Dorolj 1 (Egiïn Gol). Analogies avec les donnees de l'Altaï et de Siberie. The Upper Palaeolithic General Sessions and Posters. Acts of the XIVth UISPP Congress University of Liege, Belgium, 2–8 September 2001. Oxford, Archaeopress, 2004, pp. 245–251. (In French)

Khatsenovich A. M. Rannie etapy verkhnego paleolita Severnoi Mongolii : Avtoref. ... kand. diss. ist. nauk [Early stages of Upper Paleolithic of Northern Mongolia. Cand. histor. sci. syn. diss.]. Novosibirsk, 2018, 30 p. (In Russ.)

Khatsenovich A. M., Pavlenok G. D., Rybin E. P., Gunchinsuren B., Bolorbat Ts., Odsuren D., Margad-Erdene G. Melko- i mikroplastinchatye industrii pozdnego verkhnego paleolita Severnoi Mongolii [Bladelet and microblade industries in the Late Upper Paleolithic of Northern Mongolia]. Evraziya v Kaynozoe. Stratigrafiya, paleoekologiya, kultury [Eurasia in the Cenozoic. Stratigraphy, Paleoecology, Cultures]. 2017, Is. 6, pp. 144–153. (In Russ).

Khatsenovich A. M. Rybin E. P., Gunchinsuren B., Olsen J. W., Shelepaev R. A., Zotkina L. V., Bolorbat Ts., Popov A. Yu., Odsuren D. New evidence for Paleolithic human behavior in Mongolia: The Kharganyn Gol 5 site. Quaternary International. 2017, Vol. 442, pp. 78–94.

Konstantinov M. V. Kamennyi vek vostochnogo regiona Baikalskoi Azii [The Stone Age of the Eastern region of Baikal Asia]. Ulan-Ude, Chita, BSC SB RAS Publ., Chita State Pedagogical University Publ., 1994, 180 p. (In Russ.)

Moroz P. V. Kamennye industrii rubezha pleistotsena i golotsena Zapadnogo Zabaikaliya [The lithic industries in the Western Transbaikal of the Pleistocene – Holocene boundary]. Chita, TSU Publ., 2014, 182 p. (In Russ.)

Okladnikov A. P. Paleolit Tsentralnoi Azii. Moiltyn-am (Mongoliya) [The Paleolithic of Central Asia. Moiltyn-am (Mongolia)]. Novosibirsk, 1981, 464 p. (In Russ)

Okladnikov A. P. Paleolit Mongolii. Izbrannye trudy [The Paleolithic of Mongolia. Selected works]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1986, 232 p. (In Russ)

Pavlenok G. D. Tekhnologiya obrabotki kamnya v selenginskoi kulture Zapadnogo Zabaikaliya (po materialam stoyanki Ust-Kyakhta-3) : avtoref. dis. … kand. ist. nauk [Technology of the lithic treatment in Selenga culture of Western Transbaikal (based on material of Ust-Kyakhta-3 site). Cand. histor. sci. syn. diss.]. Novosibirsk, 2015, 26 p. (In Russ.)

Reimer P. J., Bard E., Bayliss A., Beck J. W., Blackwell P. G., Bronk Ramsey C., Buck C. E., Cheng H., Edwards R. L., Friedrich M., Grootes P. M., Guilderson T. P., Haflidason H., Hajdas I., Hatte C., Heaton T. J., Hoffmann D. L., Hogg A. G., Hughen K. A., Kaiser K. F., Kromer B., Manning S. W., Niu M., Reimer R. W., Richards D. A., Scott E. M., Southon J. R., Staff R. A., Turney C. S. M., van der Plicht J. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon. 2013, Vol. 55 (4), pp. 1869–1887.

Rybin E. P., Khatsenovich A. M., Gunchinsuren B., Olsen J. W., Zwyns N. The impact of the LGM on the development of the Upper Paleolithic in Mongolia. Quaternary International. 2016, Vol. 425, pp. 69–87.

Simonet A., Tseveendorj D., Goutas N., Magail J., Moulle P.-E., Arrellano A. Tsatsyn Ereg 2: campagne 2012 de la mission archeologique Monaco-Mongolie. Bulletin de la Musee d'Anthropologie Préhistorique de Monaco. 2012, No 52, pp. 113–123. (In French).

Tashak V. I. Tortsovye klinovidnye nukleusy Zapadnogo Zabaikaliya v pozdnem paleolite i mezolite [The Narrow-faces wedge-shaped cores of Western Transbaikal in the Late Paleolithic and Mesolithic]. Kamennyi vek Yuzhnoi Sibiri i Mongolii: teoreticheskie problemy i novye otkrytiya [The Stone Age of Southern Siberia and Mongolia: theoretical problems and new discoveries]. Ulan-Ude, 2000, pp. 59–74. (In Russ.)


Full text (russian)