Situated at the crossroads of Europe and Asia, actual Kazakhstan represents a strong scientific interest in understanding of the early human migrations “Out-of-Africa” to the Far East. During the whole Pleistocene, the arid conditions of this geographic area hindered the sediment accumulative deposits and the formation of stratified Paleolithic sites. Only studies of lithic industries from the sites with a surface cultural horizon seem possible. These analyses are based on a deflation degree of artefacts and on their technological and typological study followed by a comparison with other lithic collections from stratified and dated sites from surrounding grounds. This paper presents the morphological, technological and typological study of handaxes from the surface sites discovered in the Mugalzhar mountains and in the Aral Sea region. The goal of the study is to reconstitute the operational procedure (chaîne opératoire) in handaxe manufacture with the following comparison study between the handaxe samples. The lithic collection (20 artifacts) is housed at the A. Kh. Margulan Institute of Archaeology (Almaty, Kazakhstan). The analysis of data allows seeing the stark technological difference in the handaxe manufacture from the Mugalzhary mountains and from the Aral Sea region sites. As regards the typological analysis, the great majority of these handaxes from the Mugalzhary sites are characterized by fairly elongated and massive forms. Only on is of discoidal morphology and rather thin in thickness. The other are represented by one amygdaloidal, seven ovate, two lanceolate and two naviform (spear-shaped) handaxes. Any cordiform or triangular handanxes are not determined. Between the handaxes from the Aral Sea region sites, the majority is caracterised by elongated and rather thickened forms. Only one cordiform handaxe from the sample is thin. The elongated handaxes are represented by one amygdaloidal and by three lanceolate objects. It is expected that the handaxes from the Mugalzhary sites belong to more ancient period than the collection from the Aral Sea region sites. The predominance of both lanceolate handaxes and limandes is a typical dance of the Acheulean period, in particular, of its middle phase. The knapping technology used for handaxe manufacturing processes from the Aral Sea region sites and their typology (cordiform handaxes) are representative of the Middle Paleolithic.

Osipova Evgeniya Aleksandrovna, Ph.D. student, University of Perpignan Via Domitia; 52, avenue Paul Alduy, Perpignan, Cedex 9, 66860, France; European Centre for Prehistoric Research; Avenue Léon Grégory Tautavel, 66720, France; Archaeologist, A. Kh. Margulan Institute of Archaeology; 44, Dostyk Avenue, Almaty, A25D9K0, The Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail: evgeniya.osipova2011@yandex.com 

Artyukhova Olga Anatoljevna, Candidate of Sciences (History), Leading Researcher, A. Kh. Margulan Institute of Archaeology; 44, Dostyk Avenue, Almaty, A25D9K0, The Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail: paleo_artuhova@mail.ru 

Mamirov Talgat Basarbaevich, Candidate of Sciences (History), Leading Researcher, A. Kh. Margulan Institute of Archaeology; 44, Dostyk Avenue, Almaty, A25D9K0, The Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail: tmamirov@mail.ru

Osipova E. A., Artyukhova O. A., Mamirov T. B. Lower and Middle Paleolithic of Kazakhstan: Morphological, Technological and Typological Aspect of the Study of Bilaterally Processed Products on the example of Bifaces from Aral Sea Region and the Mugalzhar Mountains. Bulletin of the Irkutsk State University. Geoarchaeology, Ethnology, and Anthropology Series. 2020, Vol. 32, pp. 3–14. https://doi.org/10.26516/2227-2380.2020.32.3 (in Russ.)

Artyukhova O. A. Mustie Tsentralnogo Kazakhstana [Moustier of Central Kazakhstan]. Almaty, IA CS MES RK Publ., 2013, 216 p. (In Russ.)

Artyukhova O. A., Mamirov T. B. Kamennyi vek Saryarki: evolyutsiya kultur ot drevnepaleoliticheskikh okhotnikov do pervykh metallurgov v svete noveishikh issledovanii [Stone Age of the Saryarka: the evolution of cultures from ancient Paleolithic hunters to the first metallurgists in the light of recent research]. Almaty, IA CS MES RK Publ., 2014, 356 p. (In Russ.)

Artyukhova O. A., Derevyanko A. P., Petrin V. T., Taimagambetov Zh. K. Paleoliticheskie kompleksy Semizbugu, punkt 4 (Severnoe Pribalkhashie) [Paleolithic complexes of Semizbugu, point 4 (Northern Balkhash)]. Novosibirsk, IAE SB RAS Publ., 2001, 120 p. (In Russ.)

Bordes F. Typologie du paleolithique ancren et moyen [Typology of the Early and Middle Paleolithic]. Bordeaux, Delmas, Publications of the Institute of Prehistory of the University of Bordeaux, 1961, Mem. 1, 103 p. (In Frensh)

Chekha A. M. Paleoliticheskie mestonakhozhdeniya poluostrova Koktyrnak (severnoe poberezhie Aralskogo morya) v Zapadnom Kazakhstane [Paleolithic sites of the Koktyrnak Peninsula (northern coast of the Aral Sea) in Western Kazakhstan]. Sbornik materialov nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii "Kazakhstan i Tsentralnaya Aziya v kamennom veke" [Collection of materials of the scientific-practical conference "Kazakhstan and Central Asia in the Stone Age"]. Almaty, Kazak universitetі Publ., 2013, pp. 93–103. (In Russ.)

Débénath A., Dibble H. L. Handbook of Paleolithic Typology. Vol. 1. Lower and Middle Paleolithic of Europe. University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994, 202 p. 

Derevyanko A. P., Petrin V. G., Gladyshev S. A., Zenin A. N., Taimagambetov Zh. K. Ashelskie kompleksy Mugodzharskikh gor (Severo-Zapadnaya Aziya) [Acheulean complexes of the Mugodzhar mountains (Northwest Asia)]. Novosibirsk, IAE SB RAS Publ., 2001, 136 p. (In Russ.)

Derevyanko A. P., Petrin V. T., Taimagambetov Zh. K., Isabekov Z. K., Rybalko A. G., Ott M. Rannepaleoliticheskie mikroindustrialinye kompleksy v travertinakh Yuzhnogo Kazakhstana [Early Paleolithic microindustrial complexes in travertines of the Southern Kazakhstan]. Novosibirsk, IAE SB RAS Publ., 2000, 300 p. (In Russ.)

Derevyanko A. P., Petrin V. T., Zenin A. N., Taimagambetov Zh. K., Gladyshev S. A., Tsybankov A. A., Slavinskii V. S. Kamennyi vek Kazakhstana: Issledovaniya Rossiisko-Kazakhstanskoi arkheologi­cheskoi ekspeditsii v Kazakhstane (1998–2001) [The Stone Age of Kazakhstan: Studies of the Russian-Kazakhstan Archaeological Expedition in Kazakhstan]. Novosibirsk, IAE SB RAS Publ., 2003, 184 p. (In Russ.)

Derevyanko A. P., Taimagambetov Zh. K., Petrin V. T., Gladyshev S. A., Zenin A. N.., Zenin V. N., Iskakov G. T. Paleoliticheskie mestonakhozhdeniya severnogo poberezhiya Aralskogo morya [Paleolithic sites of the northern coast of the Aral Sea]. Problemy arkheologii, etnografii, antropologii Sibiri i sopredelnykh territorii [Problems of Archaeology, Ethnography, Anthropology of Siberia and Neighboring Territories]. Novosibirsk, IAE SB RAS Publ., 1999, pp. 46–49 (In Russ.)

Dini M., Filippi O. Chapitre VII. Des bifaces aux industries à éclats du Paléolithique inférieur [Chapter VII. Bifaces to the flashing industries of the Lower Paleolithic]. Comprendre la Taille de la Pierre au Paléolithique [Understanding Stone Cutting in the Paleolithic]. Perpignan, University presses of Perpignan, 2012, pp. 79–96 (In Frensh)

Gosudarstvennyi katalog geograficheskikh nazvanii Respubliki Kazakhstan [State catalog of geographical names of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. T. 13. Aktyubinskaya oblast [Vol. 13. Aktobe region]. Almaty, National Cartographic-Geodesic Fund Publ., 2016, 530 p. (In Russ.)

Inizan M.-L., Reduron M., Roche H., Tixier J. Technologie de la pierre taillée [Cut stone technology]. Meudon, CREP, CNRS, University of Paris X Nanterre, 1995, Vol. 4, 199 р. (In Frensh)

Korobkov I. I. K probleme izucheniya nizhnepaleoliticheskikh poselenii otkrytogo tipa s razrushennym kulturnym sloem [The problem of studying of Lower Paleolithic open-type settlements with a destroyed cultural layer]. Materialy i issledovaniya po arkheologii SSSR. T. 173. Paleolit i neolit SSSR [Materials and researches on Archaeology of the USSR. Vol. 173. Paleolithic and Neolithic USSR]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1971, pp. 61–69. (In Russ.)

Medoev A. G. Geokhronologiya paleolita Kazakhstana [Geochronology of the Paleolithic of Kazakhstan]. Alma-Ata, Nauka KazSSR Publ., 1982, 64 p. (In Russ.)

Osipova E. A., Artyukhova O. A. Le site paléolithique de Sémizbougou XI au Kazakhstan: nouvelle approche de l’étude techno-typologique [The Paleolithic site Semizbougou XI in Kazakhstan: New approach of techno-typological study]. L’Anthropologie, Numéro spécial: Préhistoire de la Russie [Anthropology, Special issue: Prehistory of Russia]. Vol. 123, Is. 2, pp. 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anthro.2019.06.006 2019 (In Frensh)

Vasilev S. A., Bozinski G., Bredli B. A., Vishnyatskii L. B., Girya E. Yu., Gribchenko Yu. N., Zheltova M. N., Tikhonov A. N. Chetyrekhyazychnyi (russko-anglo-franko-nemetskii) slovar-spravochnik po arkheologii paleolita [Glossary of the Paleolithic Archaeology (Russian/English/French/German)]. St. Peterburg, Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie Publ., 2007, 264 p. (In Russ., Eng., French, German)

Viallet C. Potentiel fonctionnel des outils bifaciaux au Pléistocène moyen en contexte méditerranéen. Analyse de la structure et des macro-traces des outils bifaciaux de la Caune de l’Arago, Terra Amata, Orgnac 3 et du Lazaret [Functional potential of bifacial tools in the Middle Pleistocene in the Mediterranean context. Analysis of the structure and macro-traces of the bifacial tools of the Caune of Arago, Terra Amata, Orgnac 3 and Lazaret]. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française[Bulletin of the French Prehistoric Society]. 2017, April–June, Vol. 114, Is. 2, pp. 384–386. (In Frensh)