On the Criteria of Archaeological Cultures’ Distinguishing
in Paleolithic of Transbaikalia

V. I. Tashak; Yu. E. Antonova

List of issues > «Geoarchaeology, Ethnology, and Anthropology Series». 2021. Vol 38

On the Criteria of Archaeological Cultures’ Distinguishing in Paleolithic of Transbaikalia

Full text (russian)

Author(s)

V. I. Tashak, Yu. E. Antonova

Abstract

An archaeological culture is one of the base terms of archaeology. The content of this term was discussed from the time of its introduction into scientific discourse. During the investigations in Transbaikalia, researchers asserted about Stone Age archaeological cultures for the first time at the beginning of the 1930s. Till the beginning of the 1890s, A. P. Okladnikov’s opinion has prevailed. According to him, Transbaikalia Paleolithic represented a monocultural phenomenon. This point of view is developed by some archaeologists in the present day. Additionally beginning from the 1960s the idea about existing of several archaeological cultures in the Transbaikalia Paleolithic has been generated. In the 1930s the distinguishing archaeological cultures in Transbaikalia Stone Age was based on morphology and typology of stone artifacts. In this sense, the technology of stone tools production was considered to a lesser degree. At the end of the 20th century, the main emphasis has been given to the tools’ production technology as the key component of the stone industry. Therefore, while a theoretical base of Transbaikalia Paleolithic developed stone industry was in the base of identifying archaeological cultures with the shift of some accents from morphology and typology to the technology of production. Gradually together with stone industry data of cultural horizons spatial organization becomes involved as supporting elements in distinguishing archaeological cultures in Transbaikalia. At the same time often the only stone industry is accessible for the investigations, and it demonstrates the main trend of Paleolithic material culture development. Using the complex of different criteria for distinguishing archaeological culture corresponds to the system approach which is recently developed intensively. As a result of the assessment of the synchronous stone industries of Transbaikalia, we concluded that the archaeological culture is the tool of the interpretational level and reflects phenomena that really existed in the past. It is proposed to use as criteria not only typology, morphology, and technology, reconstructed on the base of the stone industry but also life subsistent strategies reconstructed with the taking into consideration all available data. Such strategies could be conditioned by the environment, but also are the reflection of the development of the technological traditions inherent to the given culture.

About the Authors

Tashak Vasily Ivanovich, Candidate of Sciences (History), Associate Professor, Leading Researcher, Institute of Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan studies SB RAS; 6, Sakhyanova st., Ulan-Ude, Russia, 670047, e-mail: tvi1960@mail.ru

Antonova Yuliya Evgenievna, Junior Researcher, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS; 17, Acad. Lavrentiev av., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation, e-mail: yulya_an@mail.ru

For citation

Tashak V. I., Antonova Yu. E. On the Criteria of Archaeological Cultures’ Distinguishing in Paleolithic of Transbaikalia. The Bulletin of the Irkutsk State University. Geoarchaeology, Ethnology, and Anthropology Series. 2021, Vol. 38, pp. 24–33. https://doi.org/10.26516/2227-2380.2021.38.24 (in Russ.)

Keywords

Stone Age, Paleolithic, archaeological culture, stone industry, Transbaikalia

UDC

903`12(571.54/.55)

DOI

https://doi.org/10.26516/2227-2380.2021.38.24

References

Abramova Z. A. Lokalnye osobennosti paleoliticheskikh kultur Sibiri [Local specificities of the Palaeolithic cultures in Siberia]. Doklady i soobshcheniya arkheologov SSSR [Reports and communications of the USSR archaeologists]. Moscow, 1966, pp. 46–55. (In Russ.)

Anikovich M. V. Arkheologicheskaya kultura: opredelenie ponyatiya i protsedura issledovaniya [Archaeological culture: definition and treatment research].Arkheologicheskie kultury i kulturnaya transformatsiya [Archaeological cultures and cultural transformation]. Leningrad, 1991, pp. 40–48. (In Russ.)

Antonova Yu. E. Selenginskaya industriya v finale paleolita Zapadnogo Zabaikaliya (k voprosu o mezhkulturnom vzaimodeistvii) [Selenga Industry at the final stage of the Palaeolithic in the Western Transbaikalia (to the question of the intercultural connections]. Drevnie kultury Mongolii i Baikalskoi Sibiri. Materialy III Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii (Ulan-Bator, 05–09 sentyabrya 2012 g.) [Ancient cultures of Mongolia and Baikalian Siberia. The materials of the 4 International Scientific Conference (Ulaanbaatar, September 5–9th, 2012)]. Ulaanbaatar, Num Printing Department, 2012, Vol. 1, pp. 1–7. (In Russ.)

Antonova Yu. E., Tashak V. I. Kamennaya industriya Yugo-Vostochnogo kompleksa Podzvonkoi: obshchaya kharakteristika [Stone industry of Podzvonkaya South-East complex: general characterization]. Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Geoarkheologiya. Etnologiya. Antropologiya [Bulletin of the Irkutsk State University. Geoarchaeology, Ethnology, and Anthropology Series]. 2016, Vol. 3, pp. 3–20. (In Russ.)

Belikova N. V. Evolyutsiya kategorii "Arkheologicheskaya kultura" v rabotakh otechestvennykh arkheologov [Evolution of the denomination "archaeological culture" in the works of Russian archaeologists]. Vestnik Kuzbasskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Kuzbass State Technical University]. 2014, Vol. 5 (105), pp. 151–154. (In Russ.)

Binford L. R., Quimby G. I. An archaeological perspective. New York, Seminar Press, 1972, 464 p.

Blauberg I. V. Problema tselostnosti i sistemnyi podkhod [The problem of the wholness and the system approach]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 1998, 448 p. (In Russ.)

Boriskovskii P. I. Vvedenie. Kratkaya istoriya izucheniya paleolita. Obzor istochnikov [Introduction. The short history of the Palaeolithic invectigations. The review of the sources]. Arkheologiya SSSR. Paleolit SSSR [Archaeology of USSR. Palaeolithic of USSR]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984, pp. 9–16. (In Russ.)

Childe G. Ariitsy. Osnovateli evropeiskoi tsivilizatsii [The Aryans: A Study of Indo-European Origins]. Moscow, Tsentrpoligraf Publ., 2009, 269 p. (In Russ.)

Childe G. Rastsvet i padenie drevnikh tsivilizatsii. Dalekoe proshloe chelovechestva [The rise and fall of ancient civilizations. The distant past of mankind]. Moscow, Tsentrpoligraf Publ., 2012, 383 p. (In Russ.)

Debets G. F. Opyt vydeleniya kulturnykh kompleksov v neolite Pribaikaliya [The experience of the culture complexes’ distinguishing in the Baikal Neolithic]. Izvestiya assotsiatsii nauchno-issledovatelskikh institutov pri fiziko-matematicheskom fakultete MGU [The proceedings of the association of science-research institutes under the Moskow State University physicmathematic faculty]. 1930, Vol. 3, Is. 2a, pp. 151–169. (In Russ.)

Kamenetskii I. S. Arkheologicheskaya kultura – eyo opredelenie i interpretatsiya [Archaeological culture – its definition and interpretation]. Sovetskaya arkheologiya [Soviet Archaeology]. 1970, Vol. 2, рp. 18–36. (In Russ.)

Kirillov I. I. Khozyaistvenno-bytovye kompleksy i nekotorye gruppy artefaktov kak svidetelstva razvitiya dukhovnoi kultury i zarozhdeniya nauchnikh znanii v pozdnem paleolite (na primere mnogosloinogo poseleniya Sukhotino-4) [Household units and some groups of artifacts as evidences of the spiritual culture development and the origination of the science knowledge in the Late Palaeolithic (on the example of the multilayered settlement Sukhotino-4)]. Kulturno-istoricheskie formy povedeniya cheloveka [Cultural and historical forms of human behavior]. Chita, 2003, pp. 3–11. (In Russ.)

Klein L. S. Problema opredeleniya arkheologicheskoi kultury [The problem of determining archaeological culture]. Sovetskaya arkheologiya [Soviet Archaeology]. 1970, Vol. 2, рp. 37–51. (In Russ.)

Klein L. S. Arkheologicheskaya tipologiya [Archaeological typology]. Leningrad, AS USSR Publ., 1991, 448 р. (In Russ.)

Klein L. S. Arkheologiya v sedle (Kosinna s rasstoyaniya v 70 let) [Archaeology in Saddle (Kossinna in 70 Years Retrospective)]. Stratum plus. 2000, Vol. 4, pp. 88–140. (In Russ.)

Kolobova K. A., Krivoshapkin A. I. Kriterii vydeleniya arkheologicheskikh kultur v kamennom veke [Identification criteria of stone age archaeological cultures]. Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Istoriya, filologiya [Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology]. 2015, Vol. 14, Is. 7, pp. 9–17. (In Russ.)

Kolobova K. A., Krivoshapkin A. I., Nokhrina T. I. Problemy vydeleniya arkheologicheskikh kultur v kamennom veke [Problems of allocation of archaeological cultures in the Stone Age]. Gumanitarnye nauki v Sibiri [Humanitarian sciences in Siberia]. 2015, Vol. 22, Is. 2, pp. 47–51. (In Russ.)

Konstantinov A. V. Drevnie zhilishcha Zabaikaliya: (Paleolit i mezolit) [Ancient dwellings of Transbaikalia: (Palaeolithic and Mezolithic)]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 2001, 224 p. (In Russ.)

Konstantinov M. V. Kamennyi vek vostochnogo regiona Baikalskoi Azii [The Stone Age of the Eastern region of Baikal Asia]. Ulan-Ude, Chita, ION BSC SB RAS Publ., Chernyshevsky ChSPU Publ., 1994, 265 p. (In Russ.)

Kradin N. N. Arkheologicheskie kultury i etnicheskie obshchnosti [Archaeological cultures and ethnic communities]. Teoriya i praktika arkheologicheskikh issledovanii [Theory and practice of archaeological research]. Barnaul, 2009, Vol. 5, pp. 9–19. (In Russ.)

Masson V. M. Kamennyi vek Srednei Azii i ponyatie arkheologicheskoi kultury [Stone Age of the Middle Asia and the concept of archaeological culture]. Istoriya materialnoi kultury Uzbekistana [History of Uzbekistan material culture]. Tashkent, 1974, pp. 16–22. (In Russ.)

Razgildeeva I. I. Planigraficheskii analiz zhilishchnokhozyaistvennykh kompleksov verkhnego paleolita Zabaikaliya [Spatial Analysis of Housing and Economic Complexes of the Upper Paleolithic of Transbaikalia]. Chita, Transbaikal State University Publ., 2018, 208 p. (In Russ.)

Reynolds N., Riede F. House of cards: cultural taxonomy and the study of the European Upper Palaeolithic. Antiquity. 2019, Vol. 93, Is. 371, pp. 1350–1358.

Roberts B. W., Vander Linden M. Chapter 1. Investigating Archaeological Cultures: Material Culture, Variability, and Transmission. Investigating Archaeological Cultures: Material Culture, Variability, and Transmission. New York, Springer, 2011, pp. 1–21.

Sinitsyn A. A. Arkheologicheskie kultury verkhnego paleolita vostochnoi Evropy v kontekste problemy paleodemograficheskikh i kulturno-istoricheskikh rekonstruktsii [Upper Palaeolithic archaeological cultures of Eastern Europe in the context of the problem of paleodemographical and cultural-historical reconstructions]. Trudy 6 (22) Vserossiiskogo arkheologicheskogo siezda v Samare [Proceedings of the 6 (22) All-Russia Archaeological Congress in Samara]. Samara, 2020, Vol. 1, pp. 82–83. (In Russ.)

Sosnovskii G. P. Sledy prebyvaniya paleoliticheskogo cheloveka v Zabaikalie [Traces of Paleolithic human inhabitation in Transbaikal]. Trudy komissii po izucheniyu chetvertichnogo perioda [Proceedings of the commission for quaternary research]. Moscow, 1933, Vol. 3, Is. 1, pp. 23–40. (In Russ.)

Sosnovskii G. P. Novye paleoliticheskie mestonakhozhdeniya Yuzhnoi Sibiri [New Palaeolithic sites of the Southern Siberia]. Kratkie soobshcheniya instituta istorii materialnoi kultury [Brief Communications of the Institute of material culture]. Moscow, Leningrad, 1940, Vol. 7, pp. 86–90. (In Russ.)

Tashak V. I. Paleoliticheskie i mezoliticheskie pamyatniki Ust-Kyakhty [Paleolithic and Mesolithic Sites of Ust-Kyakhta]. Ulan-Ude, BSC SB RAS Publ., 2005, 130 p. (In Russ.)

Tashak V. I. Plastinchatye industrii Zabaikaliya [Blade Industry of Transbaikalia]. STRATUM plus. 2009, Vol. 1, pp. 79–93. (In Russ.)

Tashak V. I. Vostochnyi kompleks paleoliticheskogo poseleniya Podzvonkaya v Zapadnom Zabaikalie [The Eastern Complex of the Paleolithic Settlement Podvonkaya in Western Transbaikalia]. Irkutsk, Institute of Geography named V. B. Sochava SB RAS Publ., 2016, 185 p. (In Russ.)

Tashak V. I. Plastiny v industrii sloya 7g paleoliticheskogo mestonakhozhdeniya Barun-Alan-1 v Zapadnom Zabaikalie [The Blades in the Industry of Layer 7g of the Paleolithic Site Barun-Alan-1 in Transbaikalia]. Teoriya i praktika arkheologicheskikh issledovanii [Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research]. 2018, Vol. 4 (24), pp. 39–54. (In Russ.)

Tashak V. I. Arkheologicheskaya kultura s bifasami v verkhnem paleolite Zabaikaliya [Archaeological culture with bifaces in the Upper Palaeolithic of Transbaikalia].Teoriya i praktika arkheologicheskikh issledovanii [Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research]. 2020, Vol. 3 (31), pp. 119–133. (In Russ.)

Tashak V. I., Antonova Yu. E. Izmenenie sostava syriya v verkhnem paleolite Zabaikaliya kak otrazhenie ehvolyutsii proizvodstva kamennykh orudii (po materialam Podzvonkoi) [Changes in the Composition of Raw Materials in the Upper Paleolithic of Transbaikalia as a Reflection of the Evolution of the Production of Stone Tools (based on Podzvonkaya site)]. Izvestiya Laboratorii drevnikh tekhnologii [Reports of the Laboratory of Ancient Technologies]. 2009, Is. 7, pp. 52–59. (In Russ.)

Trigger B. G. A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press., 2006, 732 p.